View Single Post
Old 12-27-2011, 05:15 AM   #18
frankieGom
Interested
frankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcoverfrankieGom exercises by bench pressing the entire Harry Potter series in hardcover
 
frankieGom's Avatar
 
Posts: 132
Karma: 16358
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Paris suburb, France
Device: Kobo Touch & Glo, Sony PRS-T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigol View Post
I can't understand why it would slow down like this, because it is a database and having 5 or 1000 item in it shouldn't take more time to access it. I can understand at startup it would need to scan for new files, but for closing a book?
In a Relational DBMS there are a number of ways that database queries can be crafted, some better than others, some definitely worse, and I can easily believe that a poorly written query could yield significantly lower performances on bigger databases. Is this the case here, I do not know, but the best os probably to open a ticket so the problem can be checked by the development team.

François
frankieGom is offline   Reply With Quote