MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

pruss · 12-21-2011, 04:35 PM

I uploaded 0.09 with a slightly prettier UI.

I also benchmarked things on my Archos 43 with AnTuTu. Bigger numbers are better. Each number is an average of six tests, but with the No Dimming test having some extreme outliers removed.

No dimming:
2D: 432
3D: 678

ScreenDim, 2% brightness, 100% contrast:
2D: 435
3D: 702

ScreenDim, 2% brightness, ~50% contrast:
2D: 426
3D: 684

Screen Filter, ~50%:
2D: 336
3D: 625

There is a fair amount of variability in the tests, so take them with a bit of a grain of salt. In any case, ScreenDim imposes no significant loss of graphics speed, while Screen Filter imposes about a 30% decrease in 2D graphics speed, and a small decrease in 3D graphics speed.

12-21-2011, 04:35 PM	#30
pruss Evangelist Posts: 461 Karma: 819417 Join Date: Nov 2004	I uploaded 0.09 with a slightly prettier UI. I also benchmarked things on my Archos 43 with AnTuTu. Bigger numbers are better. Each number is an average of six tests, but with the No Dimming test having some extreme outliers removed. No dimming: 2D: 432 3D: 678 ScreenDim, 2% brightness, 100% contrast: 2D: 435 3D: 702 ScreenDim, 2% brightness, ~50% contrast: 2D: 426 3D: 684 Screen Filter, ~50%: 2D: 336 3D: 625 There is a fair amount of variability in the tests, so take them with a bit of a grain of salt. In any case, ScreenDim imposes no significant loss of graphics speed, while Screen Filter imposes about a 30% decrease in 2D graphics speed, and a small decrease in 3D graphics speed.