View Single Post
Old 12-18-2011, 08:17 PM   #76
stonetools
Wizard
stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
stonetools's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,016
Karma: 2838487
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Ipad, IPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeD View Post
Had a quick google to see if I could find anything to backup the claim and turned up this post by amazon.




You may be skeptical about what Amazon state, however, if what Amazon says is false, it would be a trivial matter for the affected publishers to show otherwise.

Also, just noticed Elfwreck's post, that's additional evidence of agency pricing impacting sales from the people who perhaps care the most about it and have the most to lose.



Even if Amazon' statement is true, what matters to the authors is not unit SALES but total amount of ROYALTIES earned. If the total royalties are higher, authors are happy no matter what the sales.
With agency pricing, publishers get to charge what they consider to be the market price for premium content. If it were not the market price, then you would see a fall off in sales for premium content- or at least slow growth in sales. What we see are rapidly rising sales. Sorry, but them's the facts.
stonetools is offline   Reply With Quote