Thread: Apple's helpful guidelines for competitors to avoid patent infringement
View Single Post
Old 12-18-2011, 03:27 PM   #134
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
The premise was, that people don't spend a lot of time and money on developing new things when there is no patent and copyright protection because it is not worthwhile for them.

Government financing does make it worth for them, obviously. They can research and be creative to their hearts' content with no risk at all. Even if they have produce no results. And those were pretty slim results after quite a few days of research from your side, covering 60 years for the most populous nation on earth.
If you look at Apple's list in the OP, what new things that they developed do they need copyright protection for?
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote