View Single Post
Old 12-16-2011, 01:45 PM   #23
Ninjalawyer
Guru
Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ninjalawyer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ninjalawyer's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 18573626
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch, Nexus 7 (2013)
Good post, very informative.

I would say though that there is some indication that publishers have illegally colluded; the Department of Justice is already investigating the issue, as is the European Union. So not exactly "no evidence to suggest that" anti-competitive behaviour took place.

Your point about retailers taking on much less risk is a good one. But, your example of Apple pricing tracks at $0.99 is not relevant; Apple is a retailer and not a competitor to content producers, it can set its pricing policy as it likes.

The allegations (so far) are that Apple colluded with 5 major publishers to ensure that retailers like Amazon and Kobo couldn't undercut Apple's prices. This is different than the iTunes example as it is the publishers (each notionally a competitor of the other) made an agreement with the effect of reducing competition in the marketplace and raising the price of some ebooks.

Last edited by Ninjalawyer; 12-16-2011 at 01:50 PM.
Ninjalawyer is offline   Reply With Quote