Quote:
Originally Posted by Phogg
Are you so bereft of intellect, and feeble of vocabulary as to think every level of corruption must be actionable, or that the courts dictate reality?
What a twisted world you weave.
If an employee takes a new pen home from the supply cabinet at the office every day and hoards them, and likewise if a patron calls out the management at restaurants to make false complaints about the wait staff to try to.get people fired... Both of those sorts of people are corrupt. Neither are worth the time of the courts, however.
Except I guess in the twisted bizarro world some of the posters here mentally inhabit.
Apple is in a court of law, and just got the snot slapped out of it (thats kind of the topic of the iOs thread, unless you have little voices in your head telling you something else) so it looks like a judge did detirmine their level of corruption was actionable.
|
I have never in all the time I have posted here found it necessary to pour scorn on a persons intellect or vocabulary merely because I disagreed with them. Yet you seem to feel it is OK to do that with me while simultaneously using an analogy of a waitron being falsly accused of questionable behavior in order to get them fired and determining this to be corrupt behavior. Very amusing.
To put in plainly. I believe my intellect is at least up to the task of disagreeing with you and I believe my vocabulary perfectly adequate for the task of general communication. Because I disagree with you does not make me stupid nor does it demonstrate a poor vocabulary. It merely points to a difference of opinion.