Thread: Apple's helpful guidelines for competitors to avoid patent infringement
View Single Post
Old 12-13-2011, 08:34 AM   #89
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by kartu View Post
Most systems aren't perfect and allow misuse, without even breaking any particular rule.
It's about morality and common sense.

Dutch judge dismissed mentioned "community design". In Dusseldorf court, which, according to FOSS blog, is well known for siding with particular side most of the time, they came to a different conclusion, that basic shapes are actually patentable.

The fact that "Dusseldorf court" with particular reputation exist, is a flaw in the legal system. The fact that community design is accepted without any formal review process is a flaw in another system.
Using these to "companies advantage" is not justifiable by neither capitalism, nor comunism or ninja turtles.
Fine, even assuming all of that, I still don't see where the corruption comes in?
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote