[measure]

jbaach:

Firstly, it goes without saying that the information you're providing is greatly appreciated by us potential buyers. You're essentially our only source for information on the M92.

I added a few links to some djvu files (in particular, ones which I read!) on the wiki in hopes that you could use them to show how the M92 performs displaying djvu files of varying quality. I am also quite curious if the M92 supports searching for text in pdf and djvu documents (and how quickly it can do it, if possible). Djvu files are quite different from pdf, as they are efficient images with arrays of text associated to points of the image (this is how the text search functions, ans far as I understand).

On a bit of a different path, how does it feel to actually hold the M92. While the skinny bezel is more aesthetically appealing, does it seem like there's not enough to hold onto?

Regarding the video quality: For me the difference in picture quality 1600x1200 versus the 960x720 does not warrant the significant difference in fps. Speaking mathematically, it would be ideal to record at twice the maximum refresh rate of the two devices, as this would ensure there are no artifacts in the videos due to the fps of the recording (this is called the nyquist frequency). Speaking personally, especially because of the resolutions youtube allows, the quality of the picture in the 800x600 is too low. I think the 960x720 is the right choice between these three.

Again, I'd like to thank you for your hard work. I'm quite close to purchasing the M92, but it still needs to prove itself after reading of the myriad of issues with the M90. At any rate, it does seem like an impressive device.


Thanks,
Ryan