View Single Post
Old 12-12-2011, 03:38 PM   #85
luqmaninbmore
Da'i
luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.luqmaninbmore ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
luqmaninbmore's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,144
Karma: 1217499
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baltimore
Device: Toshiba Thrive, Kobo Touch, Kindle 1, Aluratek Libre, T-Mobile Comet
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
All I am saying that such behavior is anti-capitalistic. Are companies amoral? Are people amoral? Companies are run by humans.
It's perfectly capitalistic. They are attempting to use the resources they possess (both material and intellectual) to maximize the return on those same resources. They are leaving no stone unturned in their quest to maximize the value they have at their command. If they can do it by intensifying production of iPads while keeping employment constant (assuming the market will absorb all the iPads they can make), they'll do it. If they can do it by using the courts to block competitors (or at least trip them up a bit), they'll do it. This is how capitalist entities (persons, corporations, states, what have you) have always behaved.
luqmaninbmore is offline   Reply With Quote