View Single Post
Old 12-08-2011, 01:35 PM   #185
CyGuy
Avid Reader
CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CyGuy's Avatar
 
Posts: 769
Karma: 7777778
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: PocketBook 902, Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, ASUS TF700, and Cybook Gen III
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
This oft-repeated argument is really complete nonsense. Lets substitute another item to see if the logic works.

" If I steal a diamond ring from a jeweler that I would never have purchased, how have I harmed the jeweler? If I enjoyed the work and tell others about it, who subsequently buy, have I benefited the jeweler? " Well, of course you haven't .
Just because products are "digital" on and the Internet doesn't mean that thje prperty laws and thje laws of economics cease to operate.
That argument does not work. If you made an exact copy of the ring using the replicator from Star Trek you have not stolen the original ring. The original owner is not out anything, they have exactly what they started with. You are mistaking theft with copyright infringement.
CyGuy is offline