Thread: Fahrenheit 451
View Single Post
Old 12-03-2011, 05:32 PM   #37
JDK1962
Groupie
JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JDK1962 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JDK1962's Avatar
 
Posts: 154
Karma: 2054094
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Device: Kindle Voyage, Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (for PDFs)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazybones View Post
The e-book should be a buck or two, certainly not $10. I just made a long post about the "long tail" pricing model in the Pricing thread, and won't repeat it here; suffice it to say that electronic distribution makes deep discounts for older titles a very useful and economically desirable model. For a book like this, which has about a kajillion used copies out there, I don't see the logic of a $10 e-version. I bet if the e-book was $1 they'd sell 50x as many copies, and everyone in the chain would make more money. Certainly I'd grab a copy just for the nostalgia version alone, even though I have a paperback copy on my bookshelf at home.


S&S should have tried an experiment: releasing the e-book of Fahrenheit 451 at $9.99, and on the same day, releasing the e-book of The Illustrated Man or Something Wicked This Way Comes at $0.99. Then at the end of a month, see which one has returned more money to them.

Maybe they'd learn something about backlist pricing. Or have some actual evidence for their current pricing policy. Because trying to price something at $9.99 when the paperback is available for $0.01 seems kinda stupid to an ignorant layman like myself.
JDK1962 is offline   Reply With Quote