View Single Post
Old 11-30-2011, 08:07 AM   #410
elcreative
Wizard
elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,888
Karma: 5875940
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: PRS505, 600, 350, 650, Nexus 7, Note III, iPad 4 etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
elcreative seems to think that the right to sue over unathorized copies & distribution thereof, includes the right to demand that the work be experienced the way the creator intended. Even if there's a contract between buyer and seller, it may not be valid. At worst, the buyer's guilty of breach of contract--but the penalties for that have to be spelled out in the contract itself.
DON'T put words in my mouth... I wouldn't give a damn about what anyone does with the hypothetical physical object once they've BOUGHT it but repurposing it, in another media when it is a designed, artistic, concept that only works in it's original form, is not right...

Once again, sorry to OP but I do get irritated by people misinterpreting at best or just putting their own words in my statements... also once again, I'll try and finish here depending on others...
elcreative is offline   Reply With Quote