Quote:
Originally Posted by shinew
Sigh... no you don't get it.
You(and some others) seem to confuse two things as one, which is personal opinions and objective observation(facts). You can say that in your eyes the older K3's background is brighter than the sun for all I care and I'm not going to dispute with that(as I've pointed out before). But to say it as fact that A is better than B, personal opinions are not enough, you need to show a methodical, objective, controlled and repeatable test results to support your view.
I thought this was common sense...
|
I don't argue with that. Of course, to me, one test done by one person with a few samples doesn't proove anything either.
I'll go on believing my lying eyes. And those of two other people IRL who complained to me about the same thing UNPROMPTED. Considering I only know three with a KT, that's not a good %age.
Even if the screens really are the same, the fact that people perceive a difference because of the bevel or whatever IS a problem. Telling them it's just their brain fooling them is as productive as saying "don't hold it that way". At least "don't hold it that way" is a workaround, sort of.