Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lyle Jordan
Sorry, but that didn't really translate over.
|
i was answering to
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by you, with my emphasis inside
I realize that anonymity is useful to protect those rightly in fear of persecution.
|
What you said I understand as "people shall only have right to hide data about them when it is proven, that the data gatherer in question has malvolent intent in doing so."
This is IMO wrong as it basically neglects the right for privacy. therefrom my reference to the creation of a transparent citizen.
I see it the other way around: just as
innocent until proven guilty
left in peace/darkness/hideout
until proven dangerous and not
!
right to hide when in danger.
So pardon me if I misunderstand
you, but as I see it it's this way:
I claim the right to demand from every person (including officials) just to get lost and leave me alone, unless they can confront me with damn good arguments (wich would be
next to impossible for non-officials) why
I don't deserve this peace.
where you in contrary advocate the best possible surveillance
just in case.