View Single Post
Old 11-20-2011, 05:13 PM   #15
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 73,747
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinecone View Post
I think that they meant lasting 10x longer, is battery charge cycles, NOT how long between charges.
Much to my surprise, no. Quoting from the article:
Even after 150 charges, which would be one year or more of operation, the battery is still five times more effective than lithium-ion batteries on the market today,” Dr. Kung said.
So charge capacity when new is 10 times current batteries, reducing to 5 time current batteries after 150 cycles, and 'declining quickly' after that.

It sounds like really a important invention. And being a modification of existing tech, perhaps five years out isn't out of the question.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote