View Single Post
Old 11-18-2011, 12:38 PM   #7
RainingLemur
Spork Connoisseur
RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RainingLemur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
RainingLemur's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,355
Karma: 16780603
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Nook Color
Quote:
Originally Posted by howyoudoin View Post
Genuine question: On whom does the burden of proof fall in a case like this? Or is it a moot point because the RIAA will come up with their usual 'you licensed it, you didn't purchase it' defence?
Probably the license/purchase defense which may be contained in the super-fine print of the service agreement/ToS/EULA that the original licensee had to agree to.
RainingLemur is offline   Reply With Quote