View Single Post
Old 11-15-2011, 03:51 PM   #112
Billi
Wizard
Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Billi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Billi's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,388
Karma: 14190103
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Berlin
Device: Cybook, iRex, PB, Onyx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
Who do you think is right, me or HarryT?
I'm no lawyer and I can err, but if you ask me what I think, this is my opinion:

It's clear that the dalek is protected but the question is if it is protected by copyright law or patent/trademark law.
- If it is protected by copyright then you might be right
- If it is protected by trademark then Harry is right.

I personally think that it is only protected by trademark. In post 95 Harry told us about it being a mass-produced good so I translate it that he owns some kind of a merchandising/advertising article (maybe I'm wrong here, but that's what I've taken from this thread). And it's implicated in the nature of merchandising products that you are allowed to take a photo of them and distribute it.
Billi is offline   Reply With Quote