View Single Post
Old 05-14-2008, 10:14 AM   #8
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
I'll take your word for it, I'm not familiar with the UK versions of these laws

Still, this isn't a copyright case, it's a trademark case. I dont' see where the woman being discussed actually did anything illegal, the knitting patterns are not copyrighted. I guess the BBC doesn't either since they say that they haven't threatened legal action against her. From what I can see, the only people who are breaking the law are the Ebay sellers. They're being accused of violating trademark law since they're selling Doctor Who items without a license. You'd think the BBC would go after them instead, and leave the woman alone.

BTW, they must have edited the article on their website. One of the sentences you quoted in your original post actually says "The patterns of Ood and Adipose were removed from her website after the BBC's commercial arm complained that they breached its trademarks." The word copyright doesn't appear anywhere in the article.

Last edited by Shaggy; 05-14-2008 at 10:19 AM.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote