I do find prolonged reading on eInk less painful than on LCD, but I know what the article writer meant when he said he wished the iPad had the iPhone's "retina display." I hate reading and writing on the iPad, with its gimped ppi; not so with iPhones 4 and 4S and the retina-fortified Touch.
iPad: 132 ppi; iPhone 4: 326.
Resolution on an LCD seems to be quite important. SAMOLED screens on 1st-gen Galaxy S phones were gorgeous, and their blacks were perfect for watching documentaries about bioluminescent fish. But when I switch back and forth from a Nexus S to an iPhone 4, I find reading far less fatiguing on the latter.
And that's coming from someone who will likely never buy an iPhone.
The first company that makes a tablet with good specs, a great screen and a resolution of 320 ppi or higher will probably have my money as long as they don't ask for too much of it.
Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 11-09-2011 at 01:28 PM.
|