View Single Post
Old 11-09-2011, 02:56 AM   #40
kartu
PRS+ author
kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kartu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,637
Karma: 2446233
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Sony PRS-300, 505, 600, 650, 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by covfam View Post
the #1 and #2 door lock companies in the western world finished thier patent infringement dispute early in the year with Kwikset (black & decker) against Schlage and Kwikset won forcing Schlage to stop making and selling its its Secure key products.
Never heard of those companies. Nice. So Apple "innovated" applying it to the mobile market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
The reason they believe that is because that's precisely what they DO have. A patent DOES grant you exclusivity for a limited time. You may choose to license the rights to other companies, but nobody can force you to do so if you don't wish to do so.
It's not quite like that.
For instance Samsung or Motorola, or Nokia, who hold key hardware patents for number of core mobile technology, can not deny others access to the patents or ask for "too high price". (since the patents have become standard)

On the other hand Apple could ban Samsung from selling stuff in Germany, since it has patented "rectangular shape with rounded corners".
kartu is offline   Reply With Quote