View Single Post
Old 11-08-2011, 03:20 PM   #178
PKFFW
Wizard
PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,791
Karma: 33500000
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: BeBook, Sony PRS-T1, Kobo H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
What is of note is that legal statements from judges that become law are called 'opinions' End of story.
Incorrect again.

Statements by judges that become law are, at that point, law. Until that point, they are opinion. That opinion can, and often is, considered precedent. Precedent is not law though.

But I tell you what, if you can link to any information showing a statement or opinion by a judge stating that copyright infringement is theft(not "like" theft, not "no different to theft", not "legally akin" to theft etc etc) and has resulted in laws being amended so as to legally classify copyright infringement as theft and has resulted in someone being charged with theft for copyright infringement, then I will gladly retract my position and publicly declare you are correct in every way.
PKFFW is offline   Reply With Quote