View Single Post
Old 11-07-2011, 08:17 AM   #12
anamardoll
Chasing Butterflies
anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anamardoll's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vxf View Post
I know it may be tempting to have faith in the 'mass-consensus' and viral marketing of the internet. But, if you truly believe that professional reviewers and editors are not needed, that the public is capable of identifying high-quality work, then remember that the three biggest literary phenomena of the past years have been Dan Brown, Twilight and Stieg Larsson.
You forgot Harry Potter, and I actually like Stieg Larsson, so there's that. Furthermore, the success of all these books can't be divorced from the marketing. If you want to use Twilight as an example that the gatekeepers we have suck, I would point out that Twilight was not self-published, so it's just as much an argument that the big houses aren't doing their job of peer review and editing.
anamardoll is offline   Reply With Quote