View Single Post
Old 05-11-2008, 08:50 PM   #22
montsnmags
Grand Sorcerer
montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 10,155
Karma: 4632658
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplumey View Post
Interesting comments, folks. I don't necessarily agree that Asimov is "soft' science fiction, though some of his work can be considered softer than others.

I'll take a look at some of your recommendations!
Incidentally, I found The Sparrow and Children of God (Mary Doria Russell) to be "soft" on the science (as in, "tread softly", not negligent) and, although I have my own reasons for disliking the books, my opinion is formed out of respect for the writing and the stories (they're in the "first contact" sub-genre). Their popularity is certainly justified. I have no hesitation in recommending them.

Cheers,
Marc

Last edited by montsnmags; 05-11-2008 at 08:50 PM. Reason: Forgot to mention the author
montsnmags is offline   Reply With Quote