View Single Post
Old 11-04-2011, 02:19 PM   #11
ScalyFreak
Sith Wannabe
ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ScalyFreak's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 8017430
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: I'm not sure... it's kind of dark.
Device: Galaxy Note 4, Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Fire HD, Aluratek Libre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggleton View Post
It's the not exactly part that I'm thinking about. Also, who determines who gets to be an official? Is Amazon an official censor? Am I? Are you?
Of course not.

I think you're thinking of censorship as something very different from what the rest of us are. Censorship is to take something that is available to the public, and to remove parts that the censor feels should not be revealed. A good example would be if the sports journalists who uncovered the various recruiting scandals in the NCAA a few months ago (that's US college football, for the non-Americans out there) had been allowed to publish their stories only if they left out the names of the colleges that were affected. That would be censorship.

But by your definition, not allowing you to read a Kindle book you have not bought or borrowed is censorship. That makes no sense.
ScalyFreak is offline   Reply With Quote