View Single Post
Old 11-01-2011, 05:31 PM   #163
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,209
Karma: 317184274
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
They also charge a tax to TV owners. Some of the money to create shows is coming directly from viewers rather than advertisers. (Usually, I think that's the more civilized version. But it's worth noting that there's still a cost: US viewers get stuck with interruptions; UK viewers pay cash, which avoids those.)
Yes, as mentioned above, £145.50 at the moment, which is about £12.13/$20 per month. And yes, it's effectively a tax on owning a television. Technically, it's a licence for the ownership of a means of watching broadcast TV.

But of course, US viewers often choose to pay for satellite or cable TV, which probably comes to as much or more, and they still get the adverts!
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote