View Single Post
Old 10-26-2011, 04:50 AM   #27
RichL
Evangelist
RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RichL ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 407
Karma: 1096520
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: back to x51v
So what did I learn from these facts?

Tesla, the greatest inventor of the century (my opinion of course) was mediocre at choosing underlings and a lousy business man.

Edison was good at picking underlings, a good inventor, better innovator and superb business man.

Jobs was good at choosing the underlings he needed (but just okay at keeping them), a superb innovator, an unknown as an inventor, a superb business man and a showman that could give P.T. Barnum a run the his money.

Gates was every bit as good as Jobs but where Jobs filled all those shoes at once Gates filled them sequentially.

What I learned is this. If a person is moderately good at creating or innovating and outstanding as a business man and showman (Edison was no slouch as a showman either) they can become household names of great respect and wealthy to boot. If, on the other hand someone is a great inventor and innovator but a lousy business man they will become a pauper with a household name of derision.
RichL is offline   Reply With Quote