Hmm... DRM is a law now? It is a legal measure to insure public saftey, by limiting how
the product may be used or disposed of? I do admit that it resembles the "Child Saftey
Caps" that they put on old people's medicine bottles. We shouldn't complain about or
remove the DRM if it restricts our use?
Perhaps you mean it's a law like that which gave us the "low flow toilets" or shower
heads? Something else where the manufacturer has installed a feature to insure that
the consumer can't steal more than their fair share, of water, the thiefs.
Laws that regulate the use of a product generally don't put mechanisms in place that
make the product hard to use in other legitimate ways. Most, in fact don't come into
play until a crime is committed that harms someone.
You would have every right to pursue legal action against anyone uploading a copy of
your property, and bringing the theft to the attention of law enforcement. The use of
totally ineffective preemptive measures that restrict the use of your product, after the
sale, must be for another, hidden purpose.
Luck;
Ken
|