View Single Post
Old 10-13-2011, 09:03 PM   #185
ScalyFreak
Sith Wannabe
ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ScalyFreak ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ScalyFreak's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 8017430
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: I'm not sure... it's kind of dark.
Device: Galaxy Note 4, Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Fire HD, Aluratek Libre
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
Copyright infringement is still against the law, DRM notwithstanding. Removing DRM, or explicitly allowing the removal of DRM, does not somehow legitimize copyright infringement.
Wait a second. I can't believe I didn't catch this until now.

Since when is DRM removal automatically copyright infringement? If you've purchased the material and you're not redistributing it, then you're not infringing on anyone's rights. You just removed a feature that you didn't want. DRM removal and copy right infringement are two entirely separate things.

Last edited by ScalyFreak; 10-13-2011 at 09:23 PM.
ScalyFreak is offline