View Single Post
Old 10-11-2011, 08:39 AM   #64
b0ned0me
Connoisseur
b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.b0ned0me ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 56
Karma: 506878
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: prs 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
But I don't believe that there are different grades of Pearl screens used in e-ink readers.
I was under the impression that binning into quality (or more often, variability) ranges was extremely common with electronics components. You can see it here for example with regard to LEDs

http://www.yegopto.co.uk/expertise/Intensity_Binning

I find it extremely easy to believe that there are different bins or 'grades' of Pearl screens at slightly different prices. That might not necessarily be for differences in contrast though, it might be by percentage likelihood of dead pixes, % failure rate, color tint etc. or indeed any combination of the above.

If a factory might be able to give you 1 million screens a month at $50 if you accept contrast variations of +/-10% and colour balance within 5% of spec, but only 700K screens at $65 each if you want contrast within +/- 7.5% and colour within 2.5%, what do you buy?
b0ned0me is offline   Reply With Quote