View Single Post
Old 10-07-2011, 07:15 AM   #32
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,556
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by VydorScope View Post
Not sure I agree, but I am not nor wish to claim to be an expert and accept the possibility of being wrong. Having is not a complete verb, it needs a complement to finish the action, and in this case its church.
No. The verb "to have" can act as an "auxiliary verb", acting as part of another verb, eg "I have gone away on holiday" - in that case "have gone" is a past tense of the verb "to go". But it can also act as a "normal" verb, and that's the way it's being used in this case. In the sentence "we are having church here", "we" is the subject, "are having" is the verb, and "church" is its direct object.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote