Quote:
Originally Posted by TimW
Although the second point may seem nit-picky, the first point is troubling. Referring to a customer's entire purchase history as a "customer list" seems deceptive, at least to me. I'm not sure that the court will have a kindly view of B&N's "good intentions." We shall see.
|
The second point is no point at all. They were required to provide an opt-out, they did.
To the first point, they didn't say that former Borders customer email addresses had been transferred? In the
email they sent to
former Borders customers?
The sales history point is the only one that is even close to valid.