View Single Post
Old 09-30-2011, 09:44 AM   #30
mldavis2
Coffee Nut
mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mldavis2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mldavis2's Avatar
 
Posts: 410
Karma: 298350
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Device: Kindle 3; K4PC; Calibre
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Gumby View Post
And I've plenty of paperbacks printed in the 60s and 70s that I've bought used and which are still in excellent shape. So, yeah, the arguments for the durability of hardcover versus paperback doesn't really hold true.
Likewise, of course, which is why I said "often" rather than making a blanket statement. I have a set of David Eddings The Belgariad that are falling apart due to cheap bindings, published by DelRay in 1990. The edges of the pages are yellowed, bindings cracked and releasing and even the covers are deteriorating. I bought them new and they've never been in a car. Perhaps modern glues are better, I don't know. On the other hand, perhaps old-time craftsmanship was better than today's rush to profits at the expense of quality. And as I mentioned above, perhaps it's a planned obsolescence.
mldavis2 is offline   Reply With Quote