View Single Post
Old 09-30-2011, 09:30 AM   #60
jocampo
Layback feline
jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jocampo's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,034
Karma: 6980745
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 2nd gen, Sony DPTS1, iPad Pro 10.5"
Quote:
Originally Posted by allinhi/ View Post
Stock prices espcially for a single year tell little about company performance. Amazons income from its other retail areas is huge. Amazon is multinational. These factors make your stock price model a guide for judging these firms suspect.
I disagree with that comment.

A bad CEO o poor management directly reflects on a one year stock price. Go back and take a look on HP's, for example. You will see the impact of Mark's resignation plus the controversial decisions of the previous one. A few months maybe not, but a full year gives a good picture. Actually, is a good gauge for some companies to figure it out what to do on next quarter, what product stop producing or what not.

Apple's 1 year stock is awesome, and a direct result of good sales number on iPad and other products.

And you are right. Amazon stock shows everything there but that's what Amazon is, an online retailer. When comparing stock and company performance, there is no way to separate that.

B&N, on the other hand, is not a retailer. In fact, because B&N is smaller and basically just a bookstore, any benefit of ereader and ebook sales, if one, should be rapidly shown on a 1 year chart, at least that's my opinion.

Last edited by jocampo; 09-30-2011 at 09:34 AM.
jocampo is offline   Reply With Quote