View Single Post
Old 09-23-2011, 10:48 AM   #17
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by beppe View Post
Nevertheless, I am not surprised that any, I mean really all of the principles, postulates, hypotheses on which any, and I mean all, theories can be developed about nature, can one day be shown inaccurate to a given degree. My opinion is that it is not of truth that we are discussing but of representations of nature. I doubt that to day any scientist would build a theory of nature based on something that needs to be absolutely certain.
The idea that the speed of light is an absolute "maximum speed" is as close to certain as anything within modern physics. A century of rigorous experimentation has failed to find any flaw in the idea. The fact that you are "not surprised" by this experimental result astounds me. Do you have any concept of how rigorously special relativity has been experimentally tested?
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote