View Single Post
Old 09-19-2011, 06:35 PM   #264
drMerry
Addict
drMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmosdrMerry has become one with the cosmos
 
drMerry's Avatar
 
Posts: 293
Karma: 21022
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NL
Device: Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwidude View Post
Changes in this release:
  • Tune the check for series with gaps to exclude series with indexes >= 1000 and handle duplicates
@drMerry - I found the uber culprit for your issue - there is one series in there that has a single entry with a series index of 10,000,000. Now you will just see series like that ignored on the report.
hmmm, And I thought I had all the books in that series. Seems I have to look for some missing parts

The report is confusing in this case.
It tells me I had a lot of gaps. But in my opinion that is not true, I have a lot of missing books.

If I have a series containing 1, 3, 6
I have 2 gaps and 3 missing books counting till the max provided index number.
Afterwards I thought you did mean items with books (and I realized that you probably called it gaps to overcome the missing books in the series after the main index found).

I should suggest to change the function to count the gaps or (and?) change the dialog to display
Found x missing items (up to biggest index found per series) in y series


or

Found x missing items in y series
(no. of Items are calculated based on main index found)




Another 'problem' is that I can not find missing indexes of my series with index based on year. (e.g. (not in my lib) Guinness book of records 2000, 2001, 2003).
To fix this problem I should propose a config function:
Skip gaps larger than: x

That option would tell the plugin to not count missing indexes if more than x missing items in one gap.

assuming x is set to 1999

Guinness book of records 2000, 2001, 2003
would return 1

Guinness book of records 1, 2000, 2001, 2003
would return 2000

But this is an advanced function. For possible another future release.
I'm very happy with the current version and (again quick) fix.

Thanks for the great work again.
drMerry is offline   Reply With Quote