View Single Post
Old 09-17-2011, 03:23 PM   #14
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Guy lit: most thrillers - Tom Clancy, Ian Fleming, Robert Ludlum, early Ken Follett, even early John LeCarre.

This genre hasn't really regained its footing (IMO) since the end of the cold war - having the fate of the world world in the balance, and/or pitting two fundamentally different (or are they? see LeCarre...) societies against each other makes for some powerful situations.

Also, since far more adult women read than men, the market for guy-lit isn't as compelling. Dan Brown's oeuvre could be described as "thrillers," but not particularly "masculine" ones. I don't recall Jason Bourne or Mack Bolan spending much time in a *museum.*

It's interesting that the author of the rant isn't objecting to the existence of the "chick-lit" genre (which is good, since "Confessions of a Shopaholic" and "The Nanny Diaries" and similar books are clearly a genre), but is objecting to the fact that other books about women are being put into the same genre.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote