View Single Post
Old 04-25-2008, 09:52 PM   #23
nrapallo
GuteBook/Mobi2IMP Creator
nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nrapallo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nrapallo's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,958
Karma: 2530691
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: REB1200 EBW1150 Device: T1 NSTG iLiad_v2 NC Device: Asus_TF Next1 WPDN
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceHand View Post
...make a small white border around the text (I like to have a small border), crop every images to three overlapping images (it's not exactly what I had in mind in the above post, but it'll work good enough in most cases) and finally convert it back to a new PDF.
Just out of curiosity, by splitting the resulting images (which are doubled in height) by three vertically, does it look good (aspect ratio wise) on your ereader. This split by three should be the best if the original pdf has no/little white margins.

I think if the orginal pdf has at least 20% white space on the side/margin (that gets cropped out anyways), then to retain the newer cropped image's aspect ratio, a split by four vertically should (theorectically) look better.

Any (practical) thoughts?

EDIT: the split by three or four refers to vertical cropping and not to the place to split horizontally the line in half (or in future third, quarters...).

Last edited by nrapallo; 04-26-2008 at 03:16 PM. Reason: clarified what split by three or four means
nrapallo is offline   Reply With Quote