View Single Post
Old 09-15-2011, 09:39 PM   #7
user_none
Sigil & calibre developer
user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.user_none ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
user_none's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,487
Karma: 1063785
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Nook STR
The original article and the press release did not mention if the 2011 scores were adjusted to what they were in 1972. In 1995 the SAT was "re-centered" and gives about a 70 point advantage (verbal section) to test takers after 1995. Basically the scores had dropped so low that the College Board moved 500 to reflect the average of that year.
user_none is offline   Reply With Quote