|
I thought section 5 was covered by section 8, which clearly stated it could not be disclosed unless it's prior illegal disclosure had occured, in which case the only use of its disclosure was to facilitate the undisclosure the illegal disclosure.
I'd thought that this coverage was to prevent the inadverent case when playing intra-temporarilly where a looping game was won during the on-going play of the same game, resulting in the exclusion of the player from the game he'd just one. This in-advertent temporal paradox itself cased temporal fragmentation and a loss of mental integrity as the remaining players get trapped in a game of diminishing options until the resultant game self imploded in the so-called Morden-Paradox.
|