View Single Post
Old 09-12-2011, 10:11 AM   #10
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post
Nope, full article is still masked for me, but I do not like the phrasing of the preview portion:
I think you have misread it.

Quote:
Quote:
As physical book sales fall, publishers' fixed costs are becoming more cumbersome. One area major publishers can cushion the blow is by keeping e-book prices higher.
I believe the article writer means that the fixed costs (which are, tautologically, fixed) are not rising (since they cannot), but rather becoming a larger percentage of the gross sales, thus lowering the net.
Yes, where does it say otherwise?

Quote:
In other words, the author seems to be saying that lower prices mean that the publisher makes less money.
No, he is saying that as the number of physical books sold fall, the publisher makes less money per book, because the fixed costs become a greater proportion of the total cost.
They then say, as a separate point, that publisher are trying to make up for some of those losses by charging higher prices for eBooks.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote