Quote:
Originally Posted by Dulin's Books
and thats a problem. the materials submitted by the lawyers in a case have to be factual. using 'chopped photos in their submissions to the judge absolutely should be material. its the same as supplying false testimony.
|
It would be material if the photos were submitted to show that the devices were the same size. It is not material if the photos are used for some other purpose. In this case, the photo was used to illustrate the six design elements at issue in the case. (A point that the computerworld article much more misleadingly downplays). It was not used to suggest that the devices were the same size or had the same aspect ratio. (Which would be pointless anyway, as the size difference of the two devices is clearly shown on previous page).