View Single Post
Old 09-10-2011, 01:38 PM   #338
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhari79 View Post
Is this really the only reason for all this ruckus?
No, it isn't. A lot of commenters have neither read Apple's complaint nor the judge's rulings, and simply assert that the Tab was banned because it had a rectangular design.

This is not the case; the Tab was banned because it incorporated *numerous* protected design elements at the same time, including edge-to-edge glass, a rectangular design with rounded corners, a centered display surrounded by an evenly spaced bevel, a metal rim, the use of square icons on a grid in the display...and several other elements.

The problem, again, isn't that the Tab used a couple of these elements; the problem is that Samsung used *all* of them...and that the use of all of these elements was not required to make a tablet. The Nook Color, for example, manages to be a perfectly functional tablet without using edge-to-edge glass, a metal rim, or the use of iPad-type icons...and the little cut out in the lower left of the NC also distinguishes it from the iPad.
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote