Quote:
Originally Posted by sourcejedi
At least two people have balked at "we identified some 3500 illegally shared files of titles by our authors and ordered them removed. It took me 45 minutes". The implication is that they're checking files at over one per second. For a process where a "false positive" leaves them committing the crime of perjury, they should be checking each file manually - are they respecting that?
|
It's the authors that do the manual checking. The software identifies the files, but they need the author's permission as the copyright owner to send the takedown notice.
But still, the action in itself is pointless.