View Single Post
Old 09-09-2011, 02:22 AM   #16
Sweetpea
Grand Sorcerer
Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sweetpea ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Sweetpea's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,707
Karma: 32763414
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Krewerd
Device: Pocketbook Inkpad 4 Color; Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post
So without bringing up He Who Must Not Be Named, I was intrigued by a recent thread wherein someone contended that deliberately not buying the (unrelated) works of someone for having different views than you was a trampling of the freedom of expression/speech.
First this. The freedom of speech doesn't imply a non-freedom of listening. Somebody can say whatever they want, but they can't make me listen to them.


About the poll items: I usually don't know anything about the author, but his or her name. I often don't even know if it's a pseudonym or not...

In those rare cases where I might not like the way a person thinks/talks/whatever, the chances of me liking his or her books is small too and I wouldn't buy that book on the basis that I probably won't like the book.
Sweetpea is offline   Reply With Quote