Quote:
Originally Posted by molman
However, we've taken this thread a fair way from talking about E-read actions which was the genesis of this thread, and continuing to parse the whole using the scanned works/digital copyright infringing version has probably gone on long enough (with the breaking into people’s houses hypotheticals we now seem to be at).
|
I see the use of Starrigger's example as a way to simplify things because a real case would be better than hypothetical ones. And I have asked about whether the Curtis Agency will be able to act on behalf of publishers as well in post 108, and there was a reply in 116, so it's not like all we talked about was Starrigger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by molman
I think it is clear that your perceptions are different. I don't think either side will change position so there is probably not much point belabouring it.. and what you may see as different moral perspectives for a particular case doesn't necessarily have to equate to judgement of the overall decency of an individual.
|
I don't remember any post of his from another thread, so he didn't make any lasting impressions on me. All I have to go on is his behaviour on this thread so this is a single point perspective.