Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe
And here he might have wronged a person. But taking buying the book and producing a proofed electronic copy is not doing anything wrong. So producing the copy was not wrong. So I do not see how taking this copy and selling it against the wishes of the person that have totally legally and lorally produced the copy can be right. Making the copy available to other people seems to me not related to the work of producing the copy. So a different wrong does not make taking the copy right.
|
If he hadn't distributed the copy, it would never have got back to the author.
The author didn't break into his house and take a copy he made for his personal use.