View Single Post
Old 09-07-2011, 07:28 PM   #128
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmon View Post
In your hypo, the person who digitized the file still has his digital file, i.e., the fruits of his labor. So what has he lost when the author appropriates the uploaded copy? He has been deprived of nothing, not even his labor. And unlike the author, he has no claim based on having created the content.
And what has the author lost by having his novel on pirate sites? He still has the fruits of his labor. I know that it's not illegal for the author to use the digital copy the same way that it isn't illegal to sell PD works for profit. But I still think that both are equally immoral.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote