View Single Post
Old 09-03-2011, 07:52 PM   #95
=X=
Wizard
=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
=X='s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,671
Karma: 12205348
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
Quote:
Originally Posted by molman View Post
As vaughnmr pointed out, Google leverages access to their applications (including the marketplace) as a means of exercising some degree of control over the Android ecosystem (via licensing terms). Obviously since the OS is fundamentally open anyone can take it and do what they like with it (fork it/skin it beyond recognition..etc..).
The Google applications are some of the nicer ones from all reports so loosing these is often seen as a strike against those without the "Google Experience".
Anyone familiar enough with Android to answer my prior question or am I going to have to hit up the googles;
You need to read vaughnmr's he does not even come close to imply such tactics used by Google. He merely says you want the market pay for it else the rest is free.
=X= is offline   Reply With Quote