View Single Post
Old 09-01-2011, 08:52 AM   #9
gweeks
Fanatic
gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gweeks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 509
Karma: 3455210
Join Date: Apr 2007
Device: Rocket, Nook ST, Kobo WiFi, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by charleski View Post
"The author, publisher or agent may view the files to confirm that they are not authorized. Then the user clicks authorization for Muso to issue, to fileshare site administrators, batch takedown emails"

The person issuing the authorisation has a legal obligation to check that the indicated files do indeed violate copyrights that they own or administer. Unfortunately, AFAIK no-one's yet been prosecuted for perjuring themselves in a take-down notice, but that possibility certainly does exist.
SFWA was sued over bad takedowns and settled out of court. I have no idea what the settlement was.
gweeks is offline   Reply With Quote