View Single Post
Old 04-19-2008, 02:48 PM   #42
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pieter View Post
... since something else is also called theft without something actually being taken from you
But you are taking something tangible. You're correct that if I copy a file and you have the original, then I haven't "taken" the file from you, that's obvious on it's face. However, if you're selling copies of the file for some sum, say $2 each, then by copying the file without giving you that $2, I am, in effect taking $2 from you, because that's the condition you set upon my taking the file. The person who created the file does have a right, in my view, to establish the conditions under which he gives out copies, especially when the file's contents are protected by copyright law. (whether those laws are reasonable or not is a discussion for several dozen other threads )

Quote:
Originally Posted by pieter View Post
(read NatCh's post about reading posts in context instead of just staring blindly at words)
I don't recall making such a post ... certainly not any time recently. Perhaps you're thinking of someone else.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote